By Kurt R. Karst – In our recent post, “Hot Ticket Item – Patent Settlement Agreement Challenges,” we provided a round-up of the latest and greatest from ongoing litigation concerning patent settlement agreements (or “pay-for-delay” agreements if you prefer that term – we don’t). It’s …
By Kurt R. Karst – While Congress and The White House debate whether user fees paid pursuant to various UFAs – User Fee Acts – will be sequestered under the terms of the Budget Control Act (see here), FDA continues to move forward with planning …
By Kurt R. Karst – In the world of Hatch-Waxman, disputes over 180-day generic drug exclusivity have been commonplace for well over a decade now. Indeed, in 2012 alone there have already been a few lawsuits filed against FDA concerning generic ACTOS and generic PROVIGIL …
By Kurt R. Karst – In a decision handed down late in the day on Thursday, September 6th, Judge Amy Berman Jackson of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia dealt a blow to K-V Pharmaceutical Company’s (“KV’s”) efforts to “restore” orphan drug …
By Kurt R. Karst – As we patiently await FDA’s next annual report to Congress on 505(q) citizen petitions (see our previous posts on FDA’s annual reports here, here, and here) we thought we would take a minute to share with our readers some observations …
By Kurt R. Karst – One recent afternoon we returned to our office from a meeting to find the new (2012) nine-volume set of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (“CFR”) placed on our desk chair. There’s a special place on our desk …
By Kurt R. Karst – It seems that hardly a day goes by without something new happening concerning patent settlement agreements. They are generally referred to as “pay-for-delay” agreements; however, that’s a bit of a loaded term, and one we try to avoid. We just …
By Alexander J. Varond – The Institute of Medicine (“IOM”) recently issued a paper titled “Accelerating the Development of New Drugs and Diagnostics: Maximizing the Impact of the Cures Acceleration Network: Workshop Summary.” The IOM paper summarizes the “Maximizing the Goals of the Cures Acceleration Network to …
By Kurt R. Karst – In a pair of Federal Register notices (here and here) set for publication on August 27, 2012, and in a pair of draft guidance documents released ahead of their announcement in the Federal Register next week (here and here), FDA …
By Kurt R. Karst – Just before Congress recessed for the month of August, and less than a month after the July 9th enactment of the FDA Safety and Innovation Act, several FDA-related bills were placed in the hoppers in the U.S. Senate and U.S. House …
By Kurt R. Karst – Efforts to include a 12-year period of exclusivity for biological products in the Trans-Pacific Partnership (“TPP”) agreement chapter on intellectual property rights are alive and well as folks ramp up for the 14th negotiating round of the TPP, which will take …
By Kurt R. Karst – It’s been nearly nine years since the enactment of the Medicare Modernization Act (“MMA”), which, among other things, changed the regime for 180-day generic drug marketing exclusivity from a “patent-by-patent” approach (under which shared exclusivity can exist for cross-Paragraph IV filers …
By Kurt R. Karst – That’s the picture conjured up when we plugged some dates into the new model for calculating forfeiture of 180-day generic drug marketing exclusivity for certain ANDAs – what we are calling “window ANDAs” – covered by Section 1133 of the recently …
By Kurt R. Karst – There’s a first time for everything! And on August 8th, 2012, FDA decided, for the first time since the enactment of the Orphan Drug Act, to rescind a period of 7-year orphan drug exclusivity. The decision came in the form of …
By Kurt R. Karst – We were eager to delve into the Federal Circuit’s recent 2-1 decision in Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Docket Nos. 2012-1062, -1103, -1104) concernng the scope of the Hatch-Waxman “safe harbor” provision at 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(1), particularly in …
