By Jennifer D. Newberger – In September 2009, FDA engaged IOM, a member of the National Academy of Sciences ("the Academy"), to review the 510(k) medical device premarket review process and answer the following questions: (1) Does the current 510(k) clearance process protect patients optimally and promote …
By Jamie K. Wolszon & Jeffrey N. Gibbs – On February 15, 2012, Hyman, Phelps & McNamara, P.C. (“HPM”) submitted supplemental comments to FDA’s June 1, 2011 draft guidance (see our previous post here) that would limit the sale and distribution of Research Use Only (“RUO”) products. HPM’s …
By Jeffrey K. Shapiro – This post is the second in an occasional series that will examine significant or interesting warning letters involving medical device companies. As a reminder, FDA issues warning letters to allege violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and/or implementing regulations. …
By Jennifer D. Newberger – On Wednesday, February 8, Representatives Mike Rogers (R-MI) and Ed Markey (D-MA) introduced H.R. 3975, The Pediatric Medical Device Safety and Improvement Reauthorization Act of 2012. The bill would put into effect a rule previously withdrawn by FDA regarding the inclusion of pediatric information …
By Jennifer D. Newberger – On Thursday, February 2, Senators Bob Casey (D-PA) and John McCain (R-AZ) introduced S. 2067, titled the “Safe, Efficient, and Transparent Medical Device Approval Act” or the “SET Device Act.” The bill would require FDA to reclassify preamendment Class III devices …
By Jennifer D. Newberger – On January 31, 2012, Rep. Edward Markey (D-MA) introduced H.R. 3847, the “Safety of Untested and New Devices Act of 2012,” also known as the “SOUND Devices Act of 2012.” The bill attempts to limit the body of devices that may …
By Jennifer D. Newberger – On Tuesday, January 24, FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health (“CDRH”) released its strategic priorities for 2012: (1) fully implement a total life cycle approach; (2) enhance communication and transparency; (3) strengthen the CDRH workforce and workplace; and (4) proactively …
Pharmaceutical and medical device applicants faced with an adverse decision from FDA (e.g., regarding data requirements, study design, or regulatory pathway) may dispute that decision through multiple routes. The appeal processes in both CDER and CDRH offer numerous strategic and procedural advantages that, when used …
By Jeffrey K. Shapiro, Jeffrey N. Gibbs & Jennifer D. Newberger – It is essential to FDA’s proper functioning that stakeholders have a viable appeals process. This means a process that is timely, transparent, and fair. A viable appeals process is an essential “check and balance” …
By Susan J. Matthees – Earlier this week, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit affirmed the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia’s decision granting FDA’s Motion to Dismiss a lawsuit filed in April 2010 by a group of ear …
By Jennifer D. Newberger – To finish out a year in which the Center for Devices and Radiological Health ("CDRH") issued what appeared to be an unprecedented number of draft guidance documents, CDRH issued two more on December 27, 2011. This blog post discusses one such …
By Jennifer D. Newberger – The Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) recently issued a report on pediatric device development. The report “(1) describes barriers to developing pediatric devices, (2) describes how pediatric device consortia have contributed to the development of pediatric devices, and (3) examines FDA data …
By Jennifer D. Newberger – On Thursday, December 15, 2011, Senators Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), and Herb Kohl (D-Wis.) introduced the “Medical Device Patient Safety Act.” This bill contains two distinct proposals: (1) to give FDA the authority to track and trend device recalls, …
By Jennifer D. Newberger – On December 5, 2011, Senator Scott Brown (R-MA) introduced S. 1943, the “Novel Device Regulatory Relief Act of 2011.” The bill is intended to amend section 513 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDC Act”) to expedite the process …
By Jeffrey K. Shapiro – In our continuing quest to enlighten, we are launching today an occasional series that will examine significant or interesting warning letters involving medical device companies. As you probably know, FDA issues warning letters to allege violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and …
