• where experts go to learn about FDA
  • Medical Devices

    • Cybersecurity Déjà VuOctober 31st, 2018

      On October 18, FDA issued a new draft guidance document, Content of Premarket Submissions for Management of Cybersecurity in Medical Devices (“Draft Guidance”). When final, it will supersede the 2014 guidance document of the same name (“Current Guidance”). The guidance comes shortly after release of …

    • FDA Issues Two New Guidance Documents on Voluntary Consensus Standards, Consolidating and Replacing Earlier GuidanceOctober 30th, 2018

      On September 14, 2018, FDA issued two new guidance documents on voluntary consensus standards used in medical device premarket submissions: (1) a draft guidance titled “Recognition and Withdrawal of Voluntary Consensus Standards” (Draft Guidance); and (2) a final guidance titled “Appropriate Use of Voluntary Consensus Standards in …

    • CDRH Introduces Third 510(k) Pilot in Less than Two Months – This Time on OCT DevicesOctober 29th, 2018

      The Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) recently announced a new voluntary pilot program to streamline review of 510(k) submissions for ophthalmic optical coherence tomography (OCT) devices. OCT devices are devices that are used for viewing, imaging, measurement, and analysis …

    • If at First You Don’t Succeed, Try, Try, Try Again: FDA Issues Plan to Increase Efficiency of 510(k) Third Party Review ProgramOctober 12th, 2018

      Last month, FDA announced a plan for revamping the 510(k) Third Party Review Program (the “Program”), which was outlined in a publication, Eliminating Routine FDA Re-Review of Third Party 510(k) Reviews (the “Plan”). One element of the Plan includes the issuance of a draft guidance, …

    • Final Guidance Issued for Considering Benefit-Risk Factors in 510(k)s with Different Technological CharacteristicsOctober 5th, 2018

      On September 25, 2018, FDA issued a final guidance document: Benefit-Risk Factors to Consider When Determining Substantial Equivalence in Premarket Notifications (510(k)) with Different Technological Characteristics (“guidance”).  A draft of the guidance was issued on July 25, 2014.  When reviewing device 510(k)s, FDA’s review of …

    • FDA Proposes Updates to the Special 510(k) ProgramOctober 3rd, 2018

      On September 28, 2018 FDA issued a new draft guidance document: The Special 510(k) Program (“draft guidance”). The draft guidance was followed by the announcement on October 1, 2018 of a Special 510(k) Pilot Program. The Special 510(k) program was established in 1998 to create a …

    • Draft Guidance Explains how Uncertainty should be Handled in Device Premarket SubmissionsOctober 2nd, 2018

      It is common for uncertainty to arise during the premarket review of novel medical devices. How CDRH has handled that uncertainty in the context of its benefit-risk assessment has generally been somewhat of a black box.  While FDA has issued numerous benefit-risk guidances, the Agency …

    • FDA Issues Final Rule on Voluntary Malfunction Summary Reporting Program for Device ManufacturersSeptember 25th, 2018

      FDA recently issued its final rule for the Voluntary Malfunction Summary Program, which permits manufacturers to report certain device malfunctions for low-risk products in summary form on a quarterly basis, as an alternative to the Medical Device Reporting (MDR) requirements set forth in section 519 …

    • Will a “Quik” 510(k) be a Quick 510(k)?September 14th, 2018

      On September 6, 2018, FDA launched the Quality in 510(k) Review Program Pilot (“Quik”). With the name “Quik,” it has a lot to live up to.  The goal of the program is to simplify the 510(k) process by providing an alternate method of preparing a …

    • FDA Seeks Comments on Proposed List of Medical Device Accessories Suitable for Class I ClassificationAugust 31st, 2018

      Comment one, comment all! As part of FDA’s ongoing effort to clarify the classification for medical device accessories (see our previous posts here, here, and here), on August 17, 2018, FDA issued a notification  requesting comments on a proposed list of accessories that FDA believes …

    • Draft Guidance Falls Short on Providing Clarity for Companies Denied Certificates to Foreign GovernmentAugust 27th, 2018

      One of the most painful consequences of a bad inspection at a U.S. facility is FDA’s resulting refusal to issue certificates to foreign governments (CFGs) until the issues are resolved. CFGs are quite often a requirement to renew licenses and permits to sell in various …

    • FDA’s IVD TA: It’s Not Just Technical AssistanceAugust 14th, 2018

      Since 1992, the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) efforts to regulate laboratory developed tests (LDTs) have been one of the most controversial device regulatory topics.  We have written about this topic multiple times (see our list at the end of this post). The focus of many …

    • Blind Voting and PMA Advisory Panels: “Do Great Minds Think Alike?”July 2nd, 2018

      By Jeffrey N. Gibbs and David A. Gibbs* – FDA’s premarket approval (PMA) advisory panels are high visibility events. Both FDA and companies invest heavily in preparing for these meetings. Thus, when the rules governing PMA panel meetings change, it should be big news. Yet, when FDA …

    • Potential Major Changes in Updated Draft Pre-Sub GuidanceJune 24th, 2018

      By far one of CDRH’s greatest recent successes has been the Pre-Submission program. In our experience, more companies have been engaging early and often with the Agency to discuss product-related regulatory issues and questions. Under the Food and Drug Administration Reauthorization Act and the MDUFA …

    • FDA Finalizes 510(k) Exemptions for Certain Class II DevicesJune 12th, 2018

      On June 5, 2018, FDA published a notice in the federal register finalizing the 510(k) exemption for several devices. The proposed list for 510(k) exemption was published last November and included two new devices that had been granted marketing authorization through the de novo process …