By Kurt R. Karst – Each year, thousands – indeed, tens of thousands – of pages are written concerning the Hatch-Waxman Amendments. As we were clearing out our in-box this past weekend, we came across two scholarly articles from some Hatch-Waxman “regulars” that we think merit …
By Kurt R. Karst – In what is, to our knowledge, the first instance in which a company has asserted the patent delisting counterclaim provisions added by the Medicare Modernization Act (“MMA”) in the context of a 505(b)(2) application – and even in the context of …
By Kurt R. Karst – On March 7th, the U.S. Supreme Court denied yet another Petition for Writ of Certiorari concerning whether patent settlement agreements (what opponents call “pay-for-delay” agreements or “reverse payments”) are unlawful and violate the antitrust laws. As we previously reported, the case, …
By Kurt R. Karst – Midnight, March 4, 2011 – that’s the time and date on which the federal government will close for business if Congress fails to approve a spending bill, or a short-term/stopgap funding measure that would likely just delay a shutdown for a …
By Kurt R. Karst – It was just yesterday that we commented on how folks in the Hatch-Waxman community have been patiently awaiting FDA’s decision on an October 2010 citizen petition (Docket No. FDA-2010-P-0545) requesting that the Agency not approve any ANDA for a generic …
By Kurt R. Karst – As folks in the Hatch-Waxman community patiently await FDA’s decision on an October 2010 citizen petition (Docket No. FDA-2010-P-0545) requesting that the Agency not approve any ANDA for a generic version of XYZAL (levocetirizine dihydrochloride) with skinny labeling that omits, via …
By Kurt R. Karst – Last week, substantively identical legislation was introduced in both the U.S. House of Representatives and in the U.S. Senate to amend the FDC Act to prohibit the manufacture, marketing, sale, or distribution of an authorized generic version of an NDA-approved drug …
By Kurt R. Karst – The tome that is the President’s Budget for Fiscal Year 2012 is chock-full of new proposals that, if implemented, would significantly affect both brand-name and generic drug manufacturers. What first caught our attention were some statements in an overview of the proposed …
By Kurt R. Karst – Late last year, Impax Laboratories, Inc. (“Impax”) filed a Complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey seeking a judgment with respect to U.S. Patent No. 6,911,217 (“the ‘217 patent”). The ‘217 patent is one of four …
By Kurt R. Karst – The drama in the decade-old fight over a Patent Term Extension (“PTE”) for U.S. Patent No. 5,196,404 (“the ‘404 patent”) covering The Medicines Company’s (“MDCO’s”) ANGIOMAX (bivalirudin) has taken yet another turn. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit …
By Kurt R. Karst – The ANDA backlog in FDA’s Office of Generic Drugs (“OGD”) continued to grow unabated in 2010. OGD started out the year with a backlog of 1963 original applications and ended the year up almost 400 applications, for a grand total of …
By Kurt R. Karst – Among the several FDA-related bills that have already been introduced in the 112th Congress – see our 112th Congress FDA Legislation Tracker – is Senator Herb Kohl’s (D-WI) Preserve Access to Affordable Generics Act (S. 27) concerning patent settlement agreements (or what …
By Kurt R. Karst – In yet another letter to FDA Commissioner Hamburg concerning the 12-year period of reference product exclusivity (which can be extended to 12.5 years with pediatric exclusivity) created by the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 (“BPCIA”), a bipartisan group …
By Kurt R. Karst – Yesterday, we posted on FDA’s report to Congress on encouraging the early submission of citizen petitions covered by FDC Act § 505(q). Today, we take a look at the two annual reports FDA has submitted to Congress detailing the Agency’s experience …
By Kurt R. Karst – On January 24th, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued its decision in Gaeta v. Perrigo, reversing a decision from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (San Jose Division) that Plaintiff-Appellant Gaeta’s state law …
