With the growth of biosimilar applications, courts have been faced with a litany of questions arising from the interplay between reference product intellectual property and the biosimilar application process. Though the BPCIA was designed to “learn” from FDA’s experience with the Hatch-Waxman Act, the procedural …
Since as early as 2005, industry has asked FDA for its input on the listing of device patents in the Orange Book (see our previous post here). FDA has, for the most part, refused to address this question. As such, industry has decided to just …
Animals, shmanimals. Or so says FDA. Well, FDA didn’t actually say that, but that’s the effect of the District Court of D.C.’s recent ruling in Vanda Pharmaceuticals v. FDA. In a case we have been following for the last year or so, the District Court …
As more biosimilars are approved (we’re up to 26 now!), FDA has been rolling out guidance documents under the Biosimilars Action Plan (“BAP”). The most recent guidance has been long awaited. While the Hatch-Waxman Act explicitly provides that an applicant can seek approval for only …
Those familiar with the Hatch-Waxman Act and its various incentives to stimulate drug innovation know that New Chemical Entity (“NCE”) exclusivity is the holy grail of small molecule exclusivity. Though orphan drug may give a sponsor two more years of exclusivity than NCE, it only …
Lately, FDA has been subject to criticism on almost every front. A recent NY Times Op-Ed alleging political interference, the popular theory that FDA fueled the opioid crisis, and the quality and inspection concerns raised in the 2019 book Bottle of Lies are all emblematic …
Only about 2 years after its last revision (which was only 5 months after its previous revision), FDA decided this week that MAPP 5240.3, Prioritization of Original ANDAs, Amendments, and Supplements, just wasn’t working. With too many ANDA submissions designated as priority, and thereby entitled …
Back in September 2019, California passed AB 824: Preserving Access to Affordable Drugs. That law sought to discourage “reverse-payment agreements” in which a brand manufacturer enters into a patent settlement agreement with a potential generic sponsor that involves a transfer of value from the brand …
The distinction between a drug and a device is a critical one: drugs and devices are subject to different regulatory schemes, with the drug pathway being significantly more onerous and expensive. User fees alone for a generic drug total $300,000 for the first year compared …
As we move in to 2020, FDA is fastidiously preparing for the event 10 years in the making: the transition. For those of you unfamiliar with the “transition,” it refers to the “deemed to be a license” provision of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation …
The Government Accountability Office released a new Report last week focusing on the oft-analyzed tactics used by some innovator or brand-name pharmaceutical manufacturers to keep generic versions of products off the market. Like some facets of then-Commissioner Gottlieb’s Drug Competition Action Plan, the GAO Report …
Following the recent trend of state intervention where federal legislative action has failed, California passed a bill last week discouraging patent infringement settlements that delay drug competition. Pay-for-delay settlements or “reverse-payment agreements” arise when the RLD-sponsor pays the putative generic sponsor to drop any Paragraph …
Over the last few years, FDA has clearly prioritized efficient generic development (see, for example, the Drug Competition Action Plan). While FDA hosted public meetings, published MAPP revisions, and compiled lists of off-patent/off-exclusivity drugs, Congress reauthorized the Generic Drug User Fee Act in 2017 and …
The Paragraph IV certification list on FDA’s website is a very useful tool for generic drug manufacturers in evaluating the potential for 180 day exclusivity for any given product. The list generally describes drug products for which one or more substantially complete ANDA containing a paragraph …
FDA recently finalized its guidance document intended to assist protein biosimilar manufacturers in demonstrating interchangeability, Considerations in Demonstrating Interchangeability With a Reference Product. Interchangeability, as of now, is nothing more than a pipe dream; no biosimilar has been declared interchangeable and therefore fully substitutable for …
