• where experts go to learn about FDA
  • Sara W. Koblitz

    • FDA’s Hatch-Waxman Public Meeting and Progression of the Agency’s Drug Competition Action PlanJuly 19th, 2017

      On July 18, 2017, FDA held a highly anticipated public meeting discussing the balance between pharmaceutical competition and innovation. Titled “Administering the Hatch-Waxman Amendments: Ensuring a Balance Between Innovation and Access,” the meeting drew a tremendous response from industry with dozens of non-FDA or FTC …

    • Never Stop Never Stopping: More Questions About the BPCIA Continue to AriseJuly 5th, 2017

      In the aftermath of the Sandoz v. Amgen Supreme Court decision, both sides should be happy that some of the procedural uncertainty surrounding the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (“BPCIA”) patent dance has been resolved.  But that would be too easy. Even though U.S. Supreme …

    • A Few More Steps in FDA’s Drug Competition Action PlanJune 27th, 2017

      As a prelude to FDA’s Hatch-Waxman Act public meeting next month, FDA announced today an updated a Manual of Policy and Procedures (MAPP) for review of generic drug applications and a public list of off-patent and off-exclusivity NDA products without ANDA competition. Effective June 27, 2017, …

    • A Meeting to Discuss FDA’s Continuing Conundrum: Innovation vs. AccessJune 22nd, 2017

      On June 21st, FDA announced an all-day public meeting dedicated to the Hatch-Waxman Amendments that will take place on July 18, 2017. The meeting, titled “The Hatch-Waxman Amendments: Ensuring a Balance Between Innovation and Access,” is part of Commissioner Gottlieb’s Drug Competition Action Plan, which he …

    • U.S. Supreme Court Rules in Amgen v. Sandoz; Gives a Potential Boost to the Biosimilars IndustryJune 12th, 2017

      In a relatively infrequent unanimous decision, the U.S. Supreme Court this morning (June 12th) interpreted the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (“BPCIA”) such that the biosimilar patent dance is not mandatory. As regular readers of the FDA Law Blog know, Amgen sued Sandoz for …

    • If Everyone’s Unhappy, Maybe You’re Doing Something Right… Comment Period on FDA’s Biosimilar Interchangeability Guidance ClosesMay 29th, 2017

      The comment period on FDA’s Draft Guidance Considerations in Demonstrating Interchangeability With a Reference Product recently closed (Docket No. FDA-2017-D-0154), and it seems like everyone has something to say about the guidance. With over 50 comments submitted, some very technical in nature, FDA has some deep …

    • Apotex Petitons FDA on Biosimilar NEULASTA; Wants Comparative Clinical Efficacy Studies in at Least One Patient PopulationApril 26th, 2017

      Apotex and its subsidiary Apobiologix submitted a Citizen Petition (Docket No. FDA-2017-P-2528) on April 21, 2017 asking that FDA ensure a level playing field for all biosimilar applicants referencing NEULASTA (pegfilgrastim). A common tactic in the small molecule world to introduce additional hurdles to generic …

    • FDA Licences Renflexis; Some Firsts for this Remicade BiosimilarApril 24th, 2017

      On April 21, FDA approved Samsung Bioepis’ Renflexis, a biosimilar referencing Pfizer’s Remicade. Like Remicade, Renflexis is approved for the treatment of Crohn’s Disease (both pediatric and adult), Ulcerative Colitis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Ankylosing Spondylitis, Psoriatic Arthritis, and Plaque Psoriasis.  Remicade was approved as an Orphan …

    • Oh Canada! Drug Importation Bills Look North to Address Accessibility and CostMarch 19th, 2017

      Oh Canada! Congress has decided that it’s once again time to start looking to our neighbors to the north for some help increasing accessibility and decreasing cost of prescription drugs.  With two new bills introduced in the last month, one in each chamber of Congress, …

    • “Chaos” Theory: Amgen’s SCOTUS Merits BriefMarch 14th, 2017

      On Friday, Amgen submitted its Opening and Response Brief at the Supreme Court in the matter of Sandoz v. Amgen, Nos. 15-1039, 15-1195.  The brief addressed two major questions with respect to the BPCIA: when an applicant can provide 180-day notice of biosimilar marketing and …

    • The Demise of the BPCIA Patent Dance?March 2nd, 2017

      Well, that was quick! Only two weeks after filing, the U.S. District Court of Delaware dismissed Genentech’s Complaint under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (“BPCIA”) against Amgen.  As we explained here, Genentech sued Amgen for failure to comply with the patent dance provisions …

    • Amgen and the BPCIA Patent Dance – ReduxFebruary 19th, 2017

      2017 is already shaping up to be a big year in court for Amgen and the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (“BPCIA”). As regular readers know, Amgen’s challenge to Sandoz’s refusal to participate in the patent dance after filing of an aBLA relying on …

    • At long last, FDA Issues Guidance on Biosimilar InterchangeabilityJanuary 17th, 2017

      After months of promises and postponements, FDA has finally published its long-awaited draft guidance on biological product interchangeability, Considerations in Demonstrating Interchangeability With a Reference Product, under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 (“BPCIA”).  While FDA had originally promised the guidance in …

    • FDA Issues “One-Stop Shop” Draft Guidance Document on Post-MMA 180-Day ExclusivityJanuary 13th, 2017

      Last January, when FDA issued the Agency’s Calendar Year 2016 Guidance Agenda, we were pretty stoked to seek guidance was planned on various ANDA and Hatch-Waxman issues, including “Three-Year Exclusivity Determinations for Drug Products;” “Submission of ANDAs for Certain Highly Purified Synthetic Peptide Drug Products;” …