Hyman, Phelps & McNamara, P.C. will hold a complimentary webinar on Thursday, January 31, 2013, from 12:00 – 2:00 PM (Eastern) on the Second Circuit's recent and long-awaited decision in United States v. Caronia. This webinar is not just another summary of the Second Circuit's decision. Nor …
By Kurt R. Karst – Every once in a while we receive a series of similar questions from various quarters such that a critical mass has been reached justifying a blog post on the topic. This is one of those posts. And it has to do …
By Kurt R. Karst – Although the number of cases involving 180-day exclusivity under the version of the FDC Act in effect before the December 8, 2003 enactment of the Medicare Modernization Act (“MMA”) is nearing an end, the pre-MMA statute, and the handling of it …
By Jeffrey K. Shapiro – FDA has enhanced authority over the sale, distribution and use of devices that the agency designates as “restricted.” 21 U.S.C. § 360j(e). FDA almost always designates Class III devices as “restricted devices” in premarket application (“PMA”) approval orders. 21 U.S.C. …
By Ricardo Carvajal – FDA released two long-awaited proposed rules to implement key provisions of the Food Safety Modernization Act ("FSMA"): Current Good Manufacturing Practice and Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based Preventive Controls for Human Food and Standards for the Growing, Harvesting, Packing, and Holding of Produce …
By Jennifer D. Newberger – On December 31, 2012, CDRH released three final guidance documents, the drafts of which were issued in the summer and fall of 2012. The quick finalization of these guidance documents is likely due to their fairly uncontroversial nature, since they are …
By Kurt R. Karst – Last week in a post-Christmas decision, Judge John D. Bates of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia granted both FDA’s and Intervenor-Defendant Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited’s (“Ranbaxy’s”) Motions for Summary Judgment and denied Mylan Laboratories Limited’s and Mylan …
By John R. Fleder – We have extensively written about the “Park Doctrine” (see, e.g., here and here) In United States v. Park, 421 U.S. 658 (1975), the Supreme Court authorized the government to criminally prosecute individuals for violations of the FDCA even if a corporate …
